[mpiwg-p2p] Info assertions draft

[Hubert Ritzdorf]

Hi,

in conjunction with the process discussion in the hybrid group:

Wouldn't it make sense to replace "process" by "MPI process" in the new text on Pages 249-250 ?

Hubert
________________________________
From: mpiwg-p2p [mpiwg-p2p-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] on behalf of Jim Dinan [james.dinan at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 9:40 PM
To: MPI WG Point To Point Communications working group
Subject: [mpiwg-p2p] Info assertions draft

Hi All,

I have attached an updated draft for the info assertions proposal.  The two week deadline is quickly approaching; please send feedback before the end of the week.

Thanks,
 ~Jim.



Click here<https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/+xpPmuWT7LDWQxILzJ5p9zsHlc6Ch4!k4z!cQRfe9O+ZalWYVqWYWDqNqu3Lw+8K!wQ2sNkfd43jwSwM3UsBbQ==> to report this email as spam.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-p2p/attachments/20160212/4fbfc469/attachment-0001.html>