[mpiwg-hybridpm] HACC WG Meeting

[Jim Dinan]

Hi All,

Let's meet at 10am ET today to discuss the partitioned communication issue
Dan mentioned below.

Cross-posting this meeting announcement to both HACC and Persistence WGs as
the topic spans both. We'll meet on the teams meeting that is shared
between the WGs: https://github.com/mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard/wiki

Cheers,
 ~Jim.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 6:28 AM Holmes, Daniel John <
daniel.john.holmes at intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
>
>
> We could look at “completion call before all partitions are marked ready”
> – see attached email chain or visit the Persistence WG list archive:
>
>
> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-persistence/2023-January/000257.html
>
>
>
> Agenda:
>
>    1. Confirm agreement of the WG that the answer I gave is the intended
>    canonical semantic
>    2. Figure out better wording that states that intent clearly
>    3. Assign a lead person who will drive the issue/PR to the March
>    voting meeting
>
>
>
> This falls between the remits of several WGs: HACC is currently the most
> active of those with an interest.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> *From:* mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org> *On
> Behalf Of *Jim Dinan via mpiwg-hybridpm
> *Sent:* 24 January 2023 21:42
> *To:* Hybrid working group mailing list <
> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> *Cc:* Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
> *Subject:* [mpiwg-hybridpm] HACC WG Meeting
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> The HACC WG will meet tomorrow (Wed) at the usual time. Please send any
> topics for this week's meeting.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>  ~Jim.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-hybridpm/attachments/20230125/c8443a9c/attachment.html>