[mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid WG Meeting

[Wes Bland]

For those who are physically present in Chattanooga, we’ll have a breakout room for the WG upstairs. Also note that the 10:30am time is US Eastern (local time) instead of what we usually use (US Central).

Thanks,
Wes

> On Sep 26, 2022, at 1:53 PM, Koziol, Quincey via mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote:
> 
> Cool, thanks.  Yes, I’m registered.
> 
> Quincey
> 
> 
>> On Sep 26, 2022, at 11:58 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com <mailto:james.dinan at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Quincey,
>> 
>> Thanks, I'll include you on the schedule. Meeting is eastern time. IIUC, you will need to register for the MPI Forum meeting in order to attend.
>> 
>>  ~Jim.
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:28 AM Koziol, Quincey <qkoziol at amazon.com <mailto:qkoziol at amazon.com>> wrote:
>> Hi Jim,
>> I’m working on a “stream” object for my async work also (along with graphs), so it would probably be worthwhile including in the list of approaches.  Might be possible to make mine compatible with 1+ of the other ones, since my async work is designed to be hardware agnostic.
>> 
>> What timezone is the 10:30am meeting in?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Quincey
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 26, 2022, at 11:03 AM, Jim Dinan via mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org <mailto:mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> The Hybrid WG will meet from 10:30 - 12:00 on Wednesday, Sept 28. I would like to spend this meeting reviewing different approaches to Accelerator stream/graph integration. At the moment, we have three approaches:
>>> 
>>> (1) MPIX_Queue as a new MPI object (Naveen)
>>> (2) MPIX_Queue as arguments to a function (Jim)
>>> (3) MPIX_Stream (Hui)
>>> 
>>> Please let me know if you have an approach that you would like to share. The goal for this discussion will be to determine a path toward a unified proposal. I don't expect we will eliminate any proposals during the discussion, but would like to gather pro/con of each and additional data/questions that we feel can help the WG narrow down the field of proposals in future work.
>>> 
>>> If time allows, I'd also like to touch briefly on accelerator triggered partitioned communication with the same goal of mapping out a path to a proposal for the MPI standard.
>>> 
>>> In case you missed it, HACC also has a reading scheduled for this week: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/714 <https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/714>
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>>  ~Jim.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org <mailto:mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm <https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm>
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-hybridpm/attachments/20220927/5e248c2c/attachment.html>