[mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change

[Steven Oyanagi]

Hi,

I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to the
branch.  Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a glance
at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something.  I assume in
most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process.  Was I suppose to
do anything else?

Please let me know if further changes are needed.
	- Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM
To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
<mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change

>Hello,
>
>FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then will
>commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning.  Hope that’s soon enough for
>you folks.
>	- Steve
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at mpi-forum.org> on behalf of
>Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
>Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org>
>Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM
>To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
><mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>
>>Steve,
>>
>>Thanks.  If you are unable to push the changes in due to access regions,
>>you can send your patch to me.  I'll apply it.
>>
>>I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to field.
>>
>>  -- Pavan
>>
>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Pavan,
>>> 
>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes.  I had
>>>problems
>>> finding the repositories until I
>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them.  Since then I ran
>>>out
>>> of time to work on the changes.
>>> 
>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly.
>>>Most
>>> of the changes are straight-forward.
>>> 
>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To”
>>>field.
>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to
>>>the
>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message.  I
>>>think
>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be
>>>"mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org”.
>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.”
>>>part.
>>> 	- Steve
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at mpi-forum.org> on behalf
>>>of
>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org>
>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM
>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>>> 
>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>> 
>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for
>>>>pages
>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your changes
>>>>in
>>>> git.  Did you commit your changes in?  If not, can you please commit
>>>>them
>>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification`
>>>>branch
>>>> on git at github.com:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> -- Pavan
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>