[mpiwg-hybridpm] Telecon today and extra meeting tomorrow (Tue 2/8 10:00 CST)

[Steven Oyanagi]

Hi,

Sorry, but I don’t think I am going to be able to be on the call today.
Cray has internal network problems, but the system is both phones and
internet connection.  I had to scramble to find a connection to send this
message ….
	- Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
Date: Monday, February 8, 2016 at 2:42 PM
To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
<mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Subject: Telecon today and extra meeting tomorrow (Tue 2/8 10:00 CST)

>Hi,
>
>Sorry to drop off the call suddenly, but I had to leave for another
>meeting and didn’t want to interrupt the current discussion.
>
>I am planning on attending the extra meeting tomorrow (Tuesday 2/8, 10:00
>CST - for an hour?). Please let me know how to connect to the meeting once
>it is determined.
>
>I will attempt to be ready to discuss pages 200-300 (I’m after Dan)
>tomorrow, but may not be ready.  Listening to Pavan today I think I missed
>some things, I want to go back and check.
>
>Thanks,
>	- Steve
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org> on
>behalf of Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
>Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
><mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>Date: Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 8:25 PM
>To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
><mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Clarification of word 'process'
>
>>
>>I've pushed the changes for pages 1-100 as well (plus the front matter
>>before page 1).  I have a bunch of notes on my changes that I'd like to
>>discuss on the call tomorrow.
>>
>>  -- Pavan
>>
>>> On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Daniel Holmes <dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk>
>>>wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I have just pushed a new branch into our mpiwg-hybrid git repo called
>>>"hybrid-process-clarification".
>>> It contains one commit: "Clarification of word 'process', pages
>>>101-200".
>>> I am anticipating that each person's changes can be recorded as a
>>>commit with a similar message to aid identification.
>>> 
>>> There are a few instances that need discussion - specifically, when the
>>>new MPI_AINT arithmetic functions are talking about the scope of
>>>validity for the resulting addresses should that be OS process or MPI
>>>process?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dan.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Dan Holmes
>>> Applications Consultant in HPC Research
>>> EPCC, The University of Edinburgh
>>> James Clerk Maxwell Building
>>> The Kings Buildings
>>> Peter Guthrie Tait Road
>>> Edinburgh
>>> EH9 3FD
>>> T: +44(0)131 651 3465
>>> E: dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk
>>> 
>>> *Please consider the environment before printing this email.*
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>