[mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon

[Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)]

If you're meeting today, note that webex is experiencing a little flaky-ness right now.  It may take a few tries to connect (they're working on it...).


> On Jan 12, 2015, at 11:53 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yep, I think our messages crossed on the wire.  I just sent out a meeting reminder.
> 
>  ~Jim.
> 
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> It’s January and time for the telecom.  Are we meeting today?
>         - Steve
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <Balaji>, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov>
> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> Date: Monday, December 15, 2014 at 5:17 PM
> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon
> 
> >
> >I think people assumed it wasn't happening because there wasn't any email
> >till very late.  Unfortunately, the next call is during the holidays.
> >Shall we cancel that call and meet again in January?
> >
> >  -- Pavan
> >
> >> On Dec 15, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Also, the PDF with feedback is now attached the trac ticket #380.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss.  Otherwise, I'll drop by
> >>quarter past the hour.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes
> >>incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF.  I'm happy
> >>to meet to review these, if folks want to.  One item that bears
> >>discussion is the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare operations
> >>to result in MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to different
> >>processes.
> >>
> >>  ~Jim.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
> >> Jim,
> >>
> >> Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the
> >>endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time?
> >>
> >> Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you
> >>are not ready yet.
> >>
> >> There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators
> >>proposal.  At least enough to encourage me to pursue it.  I'm going to
> >>take it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation
> >>experience before bringing it back up again.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>   -- Pavan
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> >> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> >> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
> >
> >--
> >Pavan Balaji  ✉️
> >http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> >mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/