[Mpi3-hybridpm] INIT/FINALIZE, with corrections suggested by Darius

[Martin Schulz]

Hi Jim,

Just as a comment: if you want to go down this route, it may be worth to think about a different approach to describing this list, since it is starting to get large. In addition to the three routines mentioned in 2.2, MPI_Get_library_version and all routines starting with MPI_T_ will be allowed as well in MPI 3 (based on the second votes for tickets #204 and #266 at the last forum).

Martin




On Feb 3, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Jim Dinan wrote:

> Right, that change wouldn't go in this ticket.  My question was more 
> along the lines of: Is this something worthwhile in the broader MPI 
> sense?  If so, I can create a ticket so we don't lose it.
> 
>  ~Jim.
> 
> On 2/3/12 2:48 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
>> 
>> On 02/03/2012 02:36 PM, Jim Dinan wrote:
>>> As long as we're updating this text, do we want to allow any additional
>>> routines before MPI_Init/after MPI_Finalize (e.g. MPI_Wtime)?
>> 
>> Why? The changes made so far are all addressing the limitations that
>> need to be addressed for the endpoints proposal. They are not being made
>> lightly. Adding MPI_WTIME is irrelevant for this.
>> 
>> That could be a separate ticket if you like. But there's no reason to
>> mix these two together.
>> 
>> -- Pavan
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mpi3-hybridpm mailing list
> Mpi3-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-hybridpm

________________________________________________________________________
Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm
CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA