[Mpi3-hybridpm] INIT/FINALIZE, with corrections suggested by Darius
balaji at mcs.anl.gov
Fri Feb 3 14:48:20 CST 2012
On 02/03/2012 02:36 PM, Jim Dinan wrote:
> As long as we're updating this text, do we want to allow any additional
> routines before MPI_Init/after MPI_Finalize (e.g. MPI_Wtime)?
Why? The changes made so far are all addressing the limitations that
need to be addressed for the endpoints proposal. They are not being
made lightly. Adding MPI_WTIME is irrelevant for this.
That could be a separate ticket if you like. But there's no reason to
mix these two together.
More information about the mpiwg-hybridpm