[mpiwg-ft] Subjects for Tomorrow's FTWG Call

[Bland, Wesley]

I was waiting until you got back from leave.

We have some notes from the discussion two weeks ago on the wiki page: https://github.com/mpiwg-ft/ft-issues/wiki/2017-10-18. We'd like to get a little more feedback on the failure model you were envisioning. It'd probably be most productive to do this on a call so we can get some back and forth.

Why don't we go ahead and cancel for this week. Jeff, can you attend next week? (Wednesdays at 12:00 PM Eastern US)

Thanks,
Wesley

On Oct 31, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com<mailto:jeff.science at gmail.com>> wrote:

What feedback do you want? I haven’t seen any specific requests for comment.

Jeff

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:04 PM Bland, Wesley <wesley.bland at intel.com<mailto:wesley.bland at intel.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

I think we're still on hold for the ULFM data resilience discussion until we're able to get some more feedback from Jeff and our non-ULFM topics are ready for another discussion with the rest of the forum.

Are there other topics that people want to discuss tomorrow or should we cancel the call?

Thanks,
Wesley
_______________________________________________
mpiwg-ft mailing list
mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org>
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft
--
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com<mailto:jeff.science at gmail.com>
http://jeffhammond.github.io/
_______________________________________________
mpiwg-ft mailing list
mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org>
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-ft/attachments/20171101/581b1e95/attachment-0001.html>