[Mpi3-ft] Ticket 323 - status?

George Bosilca bosilca at eecs.utk.edu
Wed May 30 18:24:28 CDT 2012


In total there were 5 no votes. I wonder who were the other two, they might be willing to enlighten us on their reasons to vote against.

  george.

On May 31, 2012, at 05:48 , Anthony Skjellum wrote:

> Three no votes were LLNL, Argonne, and Sandia.  Since MPI is heavily driven by DOE, convincing these folks would be important.  
> 
> Tony Skjellum, tonyskj at yahoo.com or skjellum at gmail.com
> Cell 205-807-4968
> 
> On May 31, 2012, at 5:10 AM, Richard Graham <richardg at mellanox.com> wrote:
> 
>> The main objection raised is that the text has still been having large changes, and if not for the pressure of the 3.0 deadline, this would not have come up for a vote.  I talked one-on-one with many that either voted against or abstained, and this was the major (not only) point raised.
>> 
>> Rich
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mpi3-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi3-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Aurélien Bouteiller
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 10:05 PM
>> To: MPI 3.0 Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group
>> Subject: Re: [Mpi3-ft] Ticket 323 - status?
>> 
>> It seems we had very little, if any, technical opposition on the content of the proposal itself, but mostly comments on the process. I think we need to understand more what are the oppositions. Do we have a list of who voted for and against and their rationale?
>> 
>> Aurelien
>> 
>> 
>> Le 30 mai 2012 à 08:52, Josh Hursey a écrit :
>> 
>>> That is unfortunate. A close vote (7 yes to 9 no/abstain). :/
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Josh
>>> 
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Thomas Herault 
>>> <herault.thomas at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Le 30 mai 2012 a 01:44, George Bosilca a écrit:
>>>> 
>>>>> The ticket has been voted down. Come back in 6 months, maybe 3.1. The votes were 7 yes, 4 abstains and 5 no.
>>>> 
>>>> Thomas
>>>> 
>>>> Le 30 mai 2012 à 07:02, Josh Hursey a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>>> How did the vote go for the fault tolerance ticket 323?
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- Josh
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Joshua Hursey
>>>>> Postdoctoral Research Associate
>>>>> Oak Ridge National Laboratory
>>>>> http://users.nccs.gov/~jjhursey
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mpi3-ft mailing list
>>>>> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mpi3-ft mailing list
>>>> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Joshua Hursey
>>> Postdoctoral Research Associate
>>> Oak Ridge National Laboratory
>>> http://users.nccs.gov/~jjhursey
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpi3-ft mailing list
>>> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft
>> 
>> --
>> * Dr. Aurélien Bouteiller
>> * Researcher at Innovative Computing Laboratory
>> * University of Tennessee
>> * 1122 Volunteer Boulevard, suite 350
>> * Knoxville, TN 37996
>> * 865 974 9375
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi3-ft mailing list
>> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-ft mailing list
> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft





More information about the mpiwg-ft mailing list