[Mpi3-ft] Ticket 323 - status?
richardg at mellanox.com
Wed May 30 15:10:33 CDT 2012
The main objection raised is that the text has still been having large changes, and if not for the pressure of the 3.0 deadline, this would not have come up for a vote. I talked one-on-one with many that either voted against or abstained, and this was the major (not only) point raised.
From: mpi3-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi3-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Aurélien Bouteiller
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 10:05 PM
To: MPI 3.0 Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group
Subject: Re: [Mpi3-ft] Ticket 323 - status?
It seems we had very little, if any, technical opposition on the content of the proposal itself, but mostly comments on the process. I think we need to understand more what are the oppositions. Do we have a list of who voted for and against and their rationale?
Le 30 mai 2012 à 08:52, Josh Hursey a écrit :
> That is unfortunate. A close vote (7 yes to 9 no/abstain). :/
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Thomas Herault
> <herault.thomas at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Le 30 mai 2012 a 01:44, George Bosilca a écrit:
>>> The ticket has been voted down. Come back in 6 months, maybe 3.1. The votes were 7 yes, 4 abstains and 5 no.
>> Le 30 mai 2012 à 07:02, Josh Hursey a écrit :
>>> How did the vote go for the fault tolerance ticket 323?
>>> -- Josh
>>> Joshua Hursey
>>> Postdoctoral Research Associate
>>> Oak Ridge National Laboratory
>>> mpi3-ft mailing list
>>> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> mpi3-ft mailing list
>> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
> Joshua Hursey
> Postdoctoral Research Associate
> Oak Ridge National Laboratory
> mpi3-ft mailing list
> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
* Dr. Aurélien Bouteiller
* Researcher at Innovative Computing Laboratory
* University of Tennessee
* 1122 Volunteer Boulevard, suite 350
* Knoxville, TN 37996
* 865 974 9375
More information about the mpiwg-ft