[Mpi3-ft] error vs fault

Darius Buntinas buntinas at mcs.anl.gov
Fri Jun 24 14:55:07 CDT 2011


Well, by that definition a user passing a bad parameter is a fault, if the implementation detects it, it's an error.  But that may need to be worded carefully to make it understandable.

-d


On Jun 23, 2011, at 6:19 PM, Graham, Richard L. wrote:

> How will you distinguish between an error that is the result of a bad parameter and a "detected fault" ?
> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> 
> Sent with Good (www.good.com)
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Darius Buntinas [mailto:buntinas at mcs.anl.gov]
> Sent:	Thursday, June 23, 2011 05:30 PM Eastern Standard Time
> To:	MPI 3.0 Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group
> Subject:	[Mpi3-ft] error vs fault
> 
> 
> I feel it would be easier to explain/understand FT related things if we distinguished between errors and faults, i.e., an error is a detected fault.  I'd like to take a stab at running through the whole standard to make these changes.  But before I spend time on this I'd like to make sure people are OK with it.
> 
> I believe I'd have to be done with this by Wednesday.  (right Josh?)
> 
> Does anyone have objections?
> 
> -d
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-ft mailing list
> mpi3-ft at lists . mpi-forum . org
> hxxp://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-ft mailing list
> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft





More information about the mpiwg-ft mailing list