[Mpi3-ft] error vs fault

[Bronevetsky, Greg]

I don't know if we need to. It sounds like this is too much detail for the type of change that Darius is proposing. It sounds good to me.

Greg Bronevetsky
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
(925) 424-5756
bronevetsky at llnl.gov
http://greg.bronevetsky.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi3-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi3-ft-
> bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Graham, Richard L.
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 4:20 PM
> To: 'MPI 3.0 Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group';
> 'MPI 3.0 Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group'
> Subject: Re: [Mpi3-ft] error vs fault
> 
> How will you distinguish between an error that is the result of a bad
> parameter and a "detected fault" ?
> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> 
> Sent with Good (www.good.com)
> 
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Darius Buntinas [mailto:buntinas at mcs.anl.gov]
> Sent:	Thursday, June 23, 2011 05:30 PM Eastern Standard Time
> To:	MPI 3.0 Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group
> Subject:	[Mpi3-ft] error vs fault
> 
> 
> I feel it would be easier to explain/understand FT related things if we
> distinguished between errors and faults, i.e., an error is a detected fault.  I'd
> like to take a stab at running through the whole standard to make these
> changes.  But before I spend time on this I'd like to make sure people are OK
> with it.
> 
> I believe I'd have to be done with this by Wednesday.  (right Josh?)
> 
> Does anyone have objections?
> 
> -d
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-ft mailing list
> mpi3-ft at lists . mpi-forum . org
> hxxp://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-ft mailing list
> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft