[Mpi3-ft] Defining the state of MPI after an error

Darius Buntinas buntinas at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Sep 22 13:06:59 CDT 2010

Umm, yeah.  Let's say a high quality implementation that cannot tolerate faults.  But I agree with your statement.


On Sep 22, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Terry Dontje wrote:

> That's funny, because I was thinking a high quality implementation would never return CANNOT_CONTINUE but more distinct error codes that lets an application to recover.  I would think very few errors would actually completely obliterate an MPI library's internal structures.  At least the implementations I've seen that's seems to be the case.

More information about the mpiwg-ft mailing list