[Mpi3-ft] Quiescence Interface

[Josh Hursey]

Starting discussion on this proposal at the next forum meeting sounds  
fine to me. I don't know if we need to devote the whole time to this  
proposal, but I can prepare a few things for our discussion. I hope  
to have a basic prototype ready by then too.

I can contact Paul Hargrove (BLCR) to see if he would be interested  
in attending this discussion. Since this proposal is a collective  
operation, it might be useful to have someone from the collective  
working group sit in to make sure the proposal is phrased appropriately.

Cheers,
Josh

On Jan 28, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Richard Graham wrote:

> Josh,
>   Thanks for sending this around.
>   I would like to schedule a time to start discussion this  
> proposal.  To do
> so, I think we need to have the impacted parties at the table.   
> Since the
> Evergrid (sp) folks and the BLCR folks are in the Bay area, would  
> it make
> sense to devote our working group time at the Forum to this  
> subject, and
> invite then to attend ?  Who else would we want to have participate  
> in this
> discussion ?
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
>
> On 1/22/09 10:21 AM, "Josh Hursey" <jjhursey at open-mpi.org> wrote:
>
>> I have updated the Quiescence Interface proposal on the wiki:
>>    https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/Quiescence
>>
>> I am interested in questions and comments from the group regarding  
>> the
>> interface, and use-cases. The primary use-case is for application
>> initiated checkpoint/restart, but the semantics of the proposed API
>> likely also open doors to other use-cases.
>>
>> Let me know what you think.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Josh
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi3-ft mailing list
>> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-ft mailing list
> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft