[MPIWG Fortran] What compilers support TS 29113?

[William Gropp]

Sounds interesting and useful.  However, “except for” is the same as “does not work” when talking about standards.

Bill

William Gropp
Director, Parallel Computing Institute
Thomas M. Siebel Chair in Computer Science
Chief Scientist, NCSA
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign





On Jun 24, 2015, at 3:29 AM, Hubert Ritzdorf <Hubert.Ritzdorf at EMEA.NEC.COM> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I used gfortran 4.9.1 and I have build an include file which adopted the definitions of the missing
> ISO_Fortran_binding.h to the implementation of gfortran (include file libgfortran.h) .
> Using this I could implement the Fortran binding for TS29113. It works except for arrays of derived Fortran Types
> which are always transferred via copy in/copy out.
> 
> Hubert
> ________________________________________
> From: mpiwg-fortran [mpiwg-fortran-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] on behalf of William Gropp [wgropp at illinois.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:34 PM
> To: MPI-WG Fortran working group
> Subject: Re: [MPIWG Fortran] What compilers support TS 29113?
> 
> gfortran no, not even with 5.1.0 .  It does have a lot of F 2008, but not even all of it, according to https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2008Status and https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/TS29113Status .
> Gfortran 5.1 fails the MPICH test because ISO_Fortran_binding.h isn’t available for GCC 5.1 (I don’t know if that’s the right test, but that’s what it does).  See also https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Further-Interoperability-of-Fortran-with-C.html#Further-Interoperability-of-Fortran-with-C .
> 
> Bill
> 
> William Gropp
> Director, Parallel Computing Institute
> Thomas M. Siebel Chair in Computer Science
> Chief Scientist, NCSA
> University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 23, 2015, at 2:01 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres at cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Jun 23, 2015, at 11:51 AM, Bill Long <longb at cray.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> gfortran - yes   (4.9 works on my Mac)
>> 
>> I thought fortran 4.9 did not have the standardized TS 29113 dope vector...?
>> 
>>> Cray - yes  (8.3 for sure, or later).
>> 
>> I knew about Cray, but I thought it was the only one.  That may be incorrect and/or outdated information.
>> 
>>> Not sure about others.  People who build libraries (mpich, OpenMPI, ...) would know based on which ones can compiler their mpi_f08 module.
>> 
>> Open MPI currently only has the non-TS-29113 interfaces for mpi_f08.  We're looking into whether it's time to implement the TS 29113 interfaces; that's the origin of my question.  :-)
>> 
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquyres at cisco.com
>> For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-fortran mailing list
>> mpiwg-fortran at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-fortran mailing list
> mpiwg-fortran at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran
> 
> 
> Click https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/op!XYE2yjUjGX2PQPOmvUiQSa3+T5MHvx+zSoc3i1rppEak!NwTIXyF11LzbbWVPirviig6hG5EbMAc+oOGgZg==  to report this email as spam.
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-fortran mailing list
> mpiwg-fortran at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran