[MPI3 Fortran] Results of San Jose Forum meeting
nmm1 at cam.ac.uk
Thu Mar 11 11:41:20 CST 2010
On Mar 11 2010, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> There certainly is an elegance to having no MPI handle conversion
> functions between use mpi/use mpi3/mpif.h. It would have been nice to
> avoid the lookup, but a) the cost really doesn't matter, and b) I think
> the usability issue is nice (i.e., assignment), even if none of the other
> benefits work out. But I'm not tied strongly to either way.
I don't find that having to define the internals of a derived type any
more elegant than defining two functions (or a single subroutine).
More information about the mpiwg-fortran