[mpi3-coll] Nonblocking collectives standard draft

Rajeev Thakur thakur at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Dec 1 15:39:00 CST 2008


MPI_Cancel cannot simply be ignored. For example, if there is an MPI_Isend
followed by MPI_Cancel, and the matching receive is never called, the cancel
cannot fail.

Rajeev 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi3-coll-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org 
> [mailto:mpi3-coll-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of 
> Greg Bronevetsky
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 11:33 AM
> To: MPI-3 Collective Subgroup Discussions; MPI-3 Collective 
> Subgroup Discussions
> Subject: Re: [mpi3-coll] Nonblocking collectives standard draft
> 
> 
> >However, if you all already think that MPI_Request_free is bad, then 
> >what do you think about the evil MPI_Cancel?
> 
> MPI_Cancel is a performance hint as far as I'm concerned, one that is 
> frequently ignored. Can you point to any semantic 
> difficulties with it?
> 
> Greg Bronevetsky
> Post-Doctoral Researcher
> 1028 Building 451
> Lawrence Livermore National Lab
> (925) 424-5756
> bronevetsky1 at llnl.gov 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-coll mailing list
> mpi3-coll at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-coll
> 




More information about the mpiwg-coll mailing list