[mpiwg-abi] Current proposal?

[Koziol, Quincey]

Yes - having a draft / strawman proposal would be good.

On Jan 18, 2023, at 10:21 AM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com<mailto:jeff.science at gmail.com>> wrote:


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.


We are currently debating a variety of design issues on https://github.com/mpiwg-abi/abi-issues/issues.

If you think it would be constructive, I can just propose what I think we should do without waiting for consensus.

Jeff

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres at cisco.com<mailto:jsquyres at cisco.com>>
To: "mpiwg-abi at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpiwg-abi at lists.mpi-forum.org>" <mpiwg-abi at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpiwg-abi at lists.mpi-forum.org>>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:48:41 +0000
Subject: Current proposal?
JeffH --

Is there a location that contains your current ABI proposal that we can all read?

--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com<mailto:jsquyres at cisco.com>


--
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com<mailto:jeff.science at gmail.com>
http://jeffhammond.github.io/
--
mpiwg-abi mailing list
mpiwg-abi at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpiwg-abi at lists.mpi-forum.org>
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-abi

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/private/mpiwg-abi/attachments/20230118/8b685951/attachment.html>