[Mpi3-bwcompat] Fwd: Re: ticket 265 udpated

[Jeff Squyres]

Hey, Dave's the slacker here, not me!  At least I came up with pseudo-formed thoughts!

:-p

See you in ~30 mins...  Maybe we'll make this a short call if Fab convinces me that explicit sizes are Bad.

On Mar 4, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Fab Tillier wrote:

> I think we should meet to at least discuss Jeff’s so-called “thought” of making count size explicit. :P
>  
> -Fab
>  
> From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Solt, David George
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 8:35 AM
> To: MPI-3 backwards compatability WG
> Subject: Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Fwd: Re: ticket 265 udpated
>  
> Sorry, we have a product deadline on Monday and this week was the last week for a class I’m teaching and grades are due tomorrow.   I’m already not sleeping or I would have stayed up late last night to do it.
>  
> Do we want to meet today to discuss the ticket or should I cancel today and setup a meeting for sometime next week so we can look at the pdf as well?
>  
> Thanks,
> Dave
>  
> From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Terry Dontje
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 10:31 AM
> To: mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Fwd: Re: ticket 265 udpated
>  
> Aw man, you mean I reviewed that pdf for no good reason :-).  I was wondering why it was 3 weeks old.  
> 
> --td
> 
> On 03/04/2011 11:19 AM, Solt, David George wrote:
> Sorry, pdf is not ready yet.   I will work on it over the weekend.
> Dave
>  
> From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Terry Dontje
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 10:00 AM
> To: mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Fwd: Re: ticket 265 udpated
>  
> 
> On 03/02/2011 08:28 PM, Fab Tillier wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>  
> I've updated ticket 265 with the comments from the last meeting.  Please take a look.  We'll go over the PDF on Friday (right David?) and hopefully agree that it's ready to send out for wider review.
>  
> TBD still (I think) is whether to split it into two tickets, one for the basic functionality, the other for the new 'w' collectives.
>  
> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/265
>  
> -Fab
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list
> Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat
> Fab, a few comments on the pdf ticket265 items.
> 
> 1.  Page 16 line 14, should this section actually call out the *_X functions?
> 2.  Page 103 line 35, should "MPI_GET_COUNT returns and MPI_GET_COUNT_X return..."
> really be "MPI_GET_COUNT and MPI_GET_COUNT_X both return..."
> 3.  Page 125 line 5, should there be a MPI_Pack_size_X routine?
> 4.  Page 410 line 42,  Should  "MPI_GET_COUNT will return..." really be
> "MPI_GET_COUNT and MPI_GET_COUNT_X will return..."
> 
> -- 
> <image001.gif>
> Terry D. Dontje | Principal Software Engineer
> Developer Tools Engineering | +1.781.442.2631
> Oracle - Performance Technologies
> 95 Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803
> Email terry.dontje_at_[hidden]
>  
>  
> 
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list
> Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat
>  
> 
> -- 
> <image001.gif>
> Terry D. Dontje | Principal Software Engineer
> Developer Tools Engineering | +1.781.442.2631
> Oracle - Performance Technologies
> 95 Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803
> Email terry.dontje_at_[hidden]
>  
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list
> Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/