[Mpi3-bwcompat] Ticket 265 ready for review

[Rajeev Thakur]

I wasn't at the last Forum meeting, so may have missed some of the background.

Is ticket #224 obsolete now? If so, you may want to indicate that in 224.

Do MPI_Send/Recv etc. remain unchanged, i.e., no MPI_Count in them? If so, why do we need a new MPI_Get_count?

Are the new "w" versions of the collectives specifically related to this ticket (i.e. to address the 64-bit count requirement) or are they a separate issue (i.e. a general need for array of datatypes instead of one datatype)? 

Minor typos: Two of the prototypes for Scatterw say Scatterv instead.

Rajeev

On Jan 26, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Fab Tillier wrote:

> Ok folks, not a whole lot of time before the meeting, so it would be great if we could get everyone to read through the ticket and make sure I didn't miss something.  I'd like to have David Solt generate a PDF sometime next week, in time for me to read it at the forum the following week (our time slot for this is 'working lunch' on Tuesday.
> 
> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/265
> 
> Thanks for your help,
> -Fab
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list
> Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat