[Mpi3-bwcompat] notes from MPI_Count discussion
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at [hidden]
Tue Feb 8 15:11:33 CST 2011
section 2.5.8
...to overcome this *limitation*.
p29:9
MPI_COUNT -> MPI_Count
p123:32
Move "The following auxillary..." down.
p96:16
We don't *return* the value MPI_UNDEFINED; we assign it to the OUT
variable size.
p96:16
also dont return size from function
p102:44
needs to mention get_elements_x
p103:27
missing an "and"
103:35
"returns" is listed twice
p125
there was some allergic reactions to the pack_size changes
drop change on line 4
keep change at line 7
p144:27
recvtype should be pluaral
int recvcounts[] (not *)
p155:12-13
t in front of the j
p155:38
missing a "dot" (multiply) before the extent
--> do we need to fix get_extent / get_true_extent to also return
count types? (adam thinks that MPI_Aint is not guaranteed to be
large enough -- may be problematic for files) Quincy chimes in
later that he thinks Adam is right.
p161:45-46
pointer types should be array types
p194:4
indent is screwed up
p194:15-16
t is in front of the j
Follow up with Pavan: he doesn't think that the W collectives
traw vote: as it stands
- yes: 14
- no: 3 -- dave g, pavan, ...? (adam?)
- pavan: hates w collectives
- dave: hates w collectives
- adam: thinks critical pieces missing (elements) -- and others that might be missing, too
- abstain: 6 -- didn't get all of them, but saw:
- 2 from OSU (Sayantan and the OSU grad student)
- new IBM guy
- ...?
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
More information about the Mpi3-bwcompat
mailing list