[Mpi3-bwcompat] Notes from last meeting + draft of standard text

[Solt, David George]

I believe that is a mistake on my part.   Yes, for this proposal I believe the intent is to require it to be 64-bit.  I will update.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rajeev Thakur
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 12:48 PM
To: 'MPI-3 backwards compatability WG'
Subject: Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Notes from last meeting + draft of standard text

So MPI_Count is not required to 64-bit?

Rjaeev 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] 
> [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of 
> Solt, David George
> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 11:31 AM
> To: MPI-3 backwards compatability WG
> Subject: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Notes from last meeting + draft of 
> standard text
> 
> I added a few notes to the meeting note page based on our 
> meeting last week.   I also put forth a rough draft of our 
> explanation of versioning and an introduction to the 
> MPI_Count concept.  
> 
> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/DraftMpiCountText
> 
> I plan to add a presentation of the associated MPI datatype 
> for MPI_Count later this week.   Feel free to update, modify, 
> criticize, praise, etc, etc.
> 
> I also added a placeholder on the main page for our 
> recommendations to authors, but have not created the link 
> yet.  If anyone wants to beat me to it, feel free to have at 
> it.  Otherwise I will take a stab at it later in the week.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dave
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list
> Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat
> 

_______________________________________________
Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list
Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden]
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat