[Mpi3-bwcompat] Notes from last meeting + draft of standard text
Solt, David George
david.solt at [hidden]
Tue Feb 9 13:20:11 CST 2010
I believe that is a mistake on my part. Yes, for this proposal I believe the intent is to require it to be 64-bit. I will update.
From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rajeev Thakur
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 12:48 PM
To: 'MPI-3 backwards compatability WG'
Subject: Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Notes from last meeting + draft of standard text
So MPI_Count is not required to 64-bit?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of
> Solt, David George
> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 11:31 AM
> To: MPI-3 backwards compatability WG
> Subject: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Notes from last meeting + draft of
> standard text
> I added a few notes to the meeting note page based on our
> meeting last week. I also put forth a rough draft of our
> explanation of versioning and an introduction to the
> MPI_Count concept.
> I plan to add a presentation of the associated MPI datatype
> for MPI_Count later this week. Feel free to update, modify,
> criticize, praise, etc, etc.
> I also added a placeholder on the main page for our
> recommendations to authors, but have not created the link
> yet. If anyone wants to beat me to it, feel free to have at
> it. Otherwise I will take a stab at it later in the week.
> Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list
Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list
More information about the Mpi3-bwcompat