[Mpi-forum] RMA WG reading/vote announcements

[Joseph Schuchart]

Dear all,

On behalf of the RMA WG I'd like to make the following voting and 
reading requests for the February meeting:


Second votes:

*RMA: Add missing win-sync calls to Example 12.21*
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/553
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/663
PDF: 
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/10042342/mpi41-report-rma-win-sync-20221118.pdf

*MPI_Win_free is synchronizing, except when it isn't*
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/551
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/659
PDF: 
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/10042443/mpi41-report-mpi-win-free-sync-20221118.pdf

*RMA: Replace 'operation' with 'operator' where appropriate*
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/429
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/637/files
PDF: 
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/10045184/mpi41-report-rma-operator-20221118.pdf 


*Fix semantic terms in RMA chapter*
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/407
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/611
PDF: 
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/10045382/mpi41-report-rma-semantic-terms-20221118.pdf

*RMA: both MPI_WIN_ALLOCATE and MPI_WIN_ALLOCATE_SHARED allocate memory*
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/554
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/664
PDF: 
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/8652275/mpi40-report-rma-win-allocate-shared-20220509.pdf 




For the following ticket, I'd like to request a no-no-reading and first 
vote:

*Allow MPI_WIN_SHARED_QUERY on created and allocated windows*
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/23
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/708/files
PDF: 
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/10045238/mpi41-report-win-shared-query.pdf 

Changes since last reading: 
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/708/files/f63ac637abe36bd4eab51fcc04f57adda906beb6..d1d8f8037ab1d9979502e2f51022d65077dc6670


For the following tickets, I'd like to request a reading:

*RMA communication procedures should have local semantics*
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/653
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/769
This change depends on the larger change adjusting the RMA chapter to 
the new semantics.

*Example 12.4: RMA communication calls may not block in PSCW*
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/555
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/671
This change depends on the larger change adjusting the RMA chapter to 
the new semantics.

*Wrap text about blocking MPI functions in Example 12.4 and 12.5 in AtoI*
Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/652
PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/768



Thanks
Joseph