[Mpi-forum] MPI_Get_elements_c

[George Bosilca]

As the _c API provides exactly the same functionality as the _x when are we
deprecating the _X API ?

  George.


On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 1:23 PM Dan Holmes via mpi-forum <
mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote:

> Hi Ken,
>
> Looks like an oversight to me.
>
> It needs a fix in "chap-ei/ei-2.tex” on line 575 of 668
> from "XFER_NUM_ELEM_SMALL”,
> to “POLYXFER_NUM_ELEM_NNI",
>
> Cheers,
> Dan.
> —
> Dr Daniel Holmes PhD
> Executive Director
> Chief Technology Officer
> CHI Ltd
> danholmes at chi.scot
>
>
>
> On 7 Jul 2021, at 15:37, Raffenetti, Kenneth J. via mpi-forum <
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This issue was raised in the MPICH GitHub
> https://github.com/pmodels/mpich/issues/5413.
>
> In MPI-3.1, we have C bindings for:
>
> int MPI_Get_elements(const MPI_Status *status, MPI_Datatype datatype, int
> *count)
> int MPI_Get_elements_x(const MPI_Status *status, MPI_Datatype datatype,
> MPI_Count *count)
> int MPI_Status_set_elements(MPI_Status *status, MPI_Datatype datatype, int
> count)
> int MPI_Status_set_elements_x(MPI_Status *status, MPI_Datatype datatype,
> MPI_Count count)
>
> MPI-4.0 added:
>
> int MPI_Get_elements_c(const MPI_Status *status, MPI_Datatype datatype,
> MPI_Count *count)
>
> But no binding was added for an _c version of MPI_Status_set_elements. Was
> this intended?
>
> Thanks,
> Ken
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpi-forum/attachments/20210713/fa98e766/attachment.html>