[Mpi-forum] "BigCount" rendering in PDF
jeff.science at gmail.com
Wed Jul 31 11:59:17 CDT 2019
> On Jul 31, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres at cisco.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 31, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> You're ignoring the long tail of consequences here -- what about PMPI/tools? What about other C++ features that we should be using, too? ...?
>> No scope creep. No slippery slope. Do the one thing we need to go and stop. Leave the rest for MPI-5.
> So PMPI/tools are out of scope?
“C++ compilers shall produce the same result as C11 generic.” Why does this need to say anything different for profiling and tools? Is this impossible?
> Looking forward to your pull request.
I won’t lose any sleep if we don’t get both C11 and C++ overloads. I’m just saying it shouldn’t be hard to get C++ if we do C11.
More information about the mpi-forum