[Mpi-forum] Assertions as INFO keys - 2nd vote

Jim Dinan james.dinan at gmail.com
Mon Feb 13 13:04:28 CST 2017


Hi All,

In re-reading the changes, we found a couple minor errors in the references
included in two of the changelog entries.  We corrected the references and
pushed an update to the ticket.  Please also consider this to be an
announcement for those changes, in case it is needed.

Thanks,
 ~Jim.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Dan Holmes <dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The point-to-point WG would like to schedule the 2nd vote for the
> “Assertions as INFO Keys” group of issues.
>
> Issue #11: permits assertions as INFO and adds 4 new assertion keys
> Issue #52: remove INFO key propagation from MPI_COMM_DUP
> Issue #53: add new function MPI_COMM_IDUP_WITH_INFO
>
> All three issues are contained in pull request #14.
>
> Links:
> https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/11
> https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/52
> https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/53
> https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/14
>
> Document:
> https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/files/772060/mpi-report.pdf
>
>
> Cheers,
> Dan.
>
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpi-forum/attachments/20170213/d37719c1/attachment.html>


More information about the mpi-forum mailing list