[Mpi-forum] Info Keys Ticket

[Jeff Hammond]

I recommend signing up for the hybrid WG email list and adding yourself to the cc box of both tickets. 

December in San Jose is a great time to discuss these tickets and you'll be current on both at that point. 

Jeff

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 30, 2014, at 8:32 AM, Richard Graham <richardg at mellanox.com> wrote:
> 
> It has some of the interested parties, not all.  I am interested in such items, and thought that the whole topic had fallen off the plate, so was very surprised to hear there is a concrete proposal, which in my view is incomplete.
>  
> Rich
>  
> From: mpi-forum [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Hammond
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 3:29 AM
> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Info Keys Ticket
>  
> Hybrid WG already had all the interested parties and was active. I don't recall p2p WG was particularly active when discussion of 381 started ~2 years ago. 
>  
> As always, every member of the forum can participate in any WG and 381/461 were always discussed in the open for anyone to see. 
>  
> As it currently stands, p2p WG has more than enough to discuss without this ticket. 
>  
> Note also that some of the info keys discussed have a greater impact when threads are involved, hence are connected to hybrid. 
>  
> Jeff
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Nov 30, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Richard Graham <richardg at mellanox.com> wrote:
> 
> Why is such a proposal coming out of the hybrid working group ?  This is more appropriate for the point-to-point working group.  Not that it is that critical what the group name is, but more to get feedback from a wide range of folks interested is such topics.
>  
> Rich
>  
> From: mpi-forum [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Jim Dinan
> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 8:58 AM
> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
> Subject: [Mpi-forum] Info Keys Ticket
>  
> Hi All,
>  
> The hybrid working group would like to put forward ticket #461 (https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/461) for consideration for MPI 3.1, with a formal reading at the upcoming December meeting.
>  
> This ticket proposes the no_any_tag and no_any_source info keys, on which we have achieved consensus.  We continue to have vigorous and productive debate on additional communicator info keys proposals that have been captured in #381.  We will pursue these additional proposals for MPI 4.0.
>  
> Thanks and see you in December,
>  ~Jim.
>  
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpi-forum/attachments/20141130/10651415/attachment-0001.html>