[Mpi-forum] which WG for generalized requests?

[Jeff Hammond]

Ok.  Fab is currently the greq WG lead and I understand he's not going
to be absent from the Forum for a while (not immediately).

Martin: Can you assign Pavan and/or me as the WG lead, assuming Fab
consents to it?

Thanks,

Jeff

On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
>
> It might make more sense to revive the generalized requests WG.  I'm very interested in helping drive the extended generalized requests proposal, whichever WG it ends up being in.
>
>   -- Pavan
>
>> On Nov 22, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I guess there is an inactive WG for generalized requests, but perhaps
>> it makes more sense to discuss in the context of the active p2p or
>> hybrid WG.
>>
>> Does anyone have any comments on this?
>>
>> The relevant ticket is https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/457.
>>
>> My motivation for revisiting this issue is that I've found a number of
>> problems that can be addressed with MPICH-style generalized requests,
>> including large-count nonblocking collectives.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Hammond
>> jeff.science at gmail.com
>> http://jeffhammond.github.io/
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
> --
> Pavan Balaji  ✉️
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum



-- 
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com
http://jeffhammond.github.io/