[Mpi-forum] Info Keys Ticket

[Jim Dinan]

Martin,

Thanks for the correction -- I thought that the deadline for 3.1 readings
was Japan, and that it moved ahead a meeting because of the quorum issue.
I guess I confused this with the errata deadline?

In any case, the info keys proposal is done and we should move it forward,
even though it may miss the 3.1 cutoff.

 ~Jim.

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Martin Schulz <schulzm at llnl.gov> wrote:

> Hi Jim, all,
>
> This ticket is on the agenda now as a reading (plenary) and we can
> certainly discuss the larger implications and how/where to handle this in
> the future.
>
> However, note that based on the current timeline, this won’t make it into
> MPI 3.1. At the moment, MPI 3.1 is slated to be completed in March. We can,
> of course, decide to change that, but if we allow new tickets this meeting
> for 3.1, this would push the a final version at least to September.
>
> Martin
>
>
> From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Main mailing list <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:05 AM
> To: Main mailing list <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Info Keys Ticket
>
> Just wanted to respond to the incomplete comment --
>
> The intention with the info keys ticket was always to bring forward each
> info key or info key topic as a separate ticket.  I know there are a lot of
> info keys left that are very important, and hopefully we can continue to
> reach consensus and bring them forward to be voted on.  The wildcards info
> key proposal really represents the start of that process and should chart
> the course for future proposals.
>
>  ~Jim.
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Richard Graham <richardg at mellanox.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It has some of the interested parties, not all.  I am interested in such
>> items, and thought that the whole topic had fallen off the plate, so was
>> very surprised to hear there is a concrete proposal, which in my view is
>> incomplete.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rich
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* mpi-forum [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] *On
>> Behalf Of *Jeff Hammond
>> *Sent:* Monday, December 01, 2014 3:29 AM
>> *To:* Main MPI Forum mailing list
>> *Subject:* Re: [Mpi-forum] Info Keys Ticket
>>
>>
>>
>> Hybrid WG already had all the interested parties and was active. I don't
>> recall p2p WG was particularly active when discussion of 381 started ~2
>> years ago.
>>
>>
>>
>> As always, every member of the forum can participate in any WG and
>> 381/461 were always discussed in the open for anyone to see.
>>
>>
>>
>> As it currently stands, p2p WG has more than enough to discuss without
>> this ticket.
>>
>>
>>
>> Note also that some of the info keys discussed have a greater impact when
>> threads are involved, hence are connected to hybrid.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> On Nov 30, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Richard Graham <richardg at mellanox.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Why is such a proposal coming out of the hybrid working group ?  This is
>> more appropriate for the point-to-point working group.  Not that it is that
>> critical what the group name is, but more to get feedback from a wide range
>> of folks interested is such topics.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rich
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* mpi-forum [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> <mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org>] *On Behalf Of *Jim Dinan
>> *Sent:* Saturday, November 22, 2014 8:58 AM
>> *To:* Main MPI Forum mailing list
>> *Subject:* [Mpi-forum] Info Keys Ticket
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> The hybrid working group would like to put forward ticket #461 (
>> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/461) for
>> consideration for MPI 3.1, with a formal reading at the upcoming December
>> meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>> This ticket proposes the no_any_tag and no_any_source info keys, on which
>> we have achieved consensus.  We continue to have vigorous and productive
>> debate on additional communicator info keys proposals that have been
>> captured in #381.  We will pursue these additional proposals for MPI 4.0.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks and see you in December,
>>
>>  ~Jim.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpi-forum/attachments/20141202/1bc4f5f0/attachment-0001.html>