[Mpi-forum] Fwd: Ticket 375: Message Queue side document

[Anh Vo]

Hi all,
I've updated ticket 375 with the latest proposal PDF. 

Thanks
Anh 

-----Original Message-----
From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:02 AM
To: Martin Schulz; Main MPI Forum mailing list
Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Fwd: Ticket 375: Message Queue side document

Cisco has no problem with this, and will be happy to vote "yes" for extending the "MQS" message queue side document's deadline until this Friday.


On May 22, 2013, at 10:56 AM, "Schulz, Martin" <schulzm at llnl.gov> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Please find below the announcement for ticket #375 for a possible reading at the June meeting. Anh tried sending it in time yesterday, but they are apparently some glitches with the email list. Did anybody else try sending something to the list that they later did not see being posted?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Martin
> 
> PS: Please see Anh's request below - according to the vote document we passed last time, the forum has the ability to be flexible with time constraints, but only if every voting eligible member institution agrees to this in a formal vote. Therefore, if there are *ANY* concerns, please let Anh and Kathryn (as the tools WG chair) know ahead of time, so they can plan accordingly. 
> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Anh Vo
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:03 PM
>> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list (mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org)
>> Subject: Ticket 375: Message Queue side document
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Currently the MQS is scheduled for official reading on Thursday June 
>> 6th
>> 
>> http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/secretary/2013/06/agenda.php
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I've created a ticket (375) and attached the latest PDF:
>> 
>> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/375
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> However, we would like to ask if it'd be okay if the final document for reading be a few days late (i.e., by Friday noon PST) for the following reasons:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 1.       It's actively being worked on
>> 
>> 2.       It's narrow in scope
>> 
>> 3.       It's a side document
>> 
>> 4.       We're waiting for and incorporating all the feedback, which has taken a while to gather
>> 
>> 5.       We're documenting current practice
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Anh
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> __ Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm 
> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum


--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/


_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum