[Mpi-forum] Discussion points from the MPI-<next> discussion today

[Jeff Hammond]

Why can't you just be explicit and say what the problem is?

Just show us some code that is compliant with both MPI-3.0 and C99
that does not work.

Jeff

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:15 PM, N.M. Maclaren <nmm1 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Sep 21 2012, Jeff Hammond wrote:
>>
>>
>> Can you send me a link to a page that describes the C89 memory model?
>> It would help me to write better C+Pthread code if I had a memory
>> model to rely upon instead of nonportable inline assembly.
>
>
> It's there in the standard.  In C99, which is more readily accessible
> and very similar to C90, the relevant wording is mainly in 5.1.2.3,
> 6.5 and 6.5.2.2.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Nick Maclaren.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum



-- 
Jeff Hammond
Argonne Leadership Computing Facility
University of Chicago Computation Institute
jhammond at alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond
https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond