[Mpi-forum] Discussion points from the MPI-<next> discussion today

Jeff Hammond jhammond at alcf.anl.gov
Fri Sep 21 15:24:39 CDT 2012

Why can't you just be explicit and say what the problem is?

Just show us some code that is compliant with both MPI-3.0 and C99
that does not work.


On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:15 PM, N.M. Maclaren <nmm1 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Sep 21 2012, Jeff Hammond wrote:
>> Can you send me a link to a page that describes the C89 memory model?
>> It would help me to write better C+Pthread code if I had a memory
>> model to rely upon instead of nonportable inline assembly.
> It's there in the standard.  In C99, which is more readily accessible
> and very similar to C90, the relevant wording is mainly in,
> 6.5 and
> Regards,
> Nick Maclaren.
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

Jeff Hammond
Argonne Leadership Computing Facility
University of Chicago Computation Institute
jhammond at alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381

More information about the mpi-forum mailing list