[Mpi-forum] Discussion points from the MPI-<next> discussion today
jhammond at alcf.anl.gov
Fri Sep 21 15:24:39 CDT 2012
Why can't you just be explicit and say what the problem is?
Just show us some code that is compliant with both MPI-3.0 and C99
that does not work.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:15 PM, N.M. Maclaren <nmm1 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Sep 21 2012, Jeff Hammond wrote:
>> Can you send me a link to a page that describes the C89 memory model?
>> It would help me to write better C+Pthread code if I had a memory
>> model to rely upon instead of nonportable inline assembly.
> It's there in the standard. In C99, which is more readily accessible
> and very similar to C90, the relevant wording is mainly in 126.96.36.199,
> 6.5 and 188.8.131.52.
> Nick Maclaren.
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
Argonne Leadership Computing Facility
University of Chicago Computation Institute
jhammond at alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381
More information about the mpi-forum