[Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question

[Mark Pagel]

Rich,

Correction.    I meant to say for the 3.0 features.  We still do not plan to support Dynamic Process Management on Cray systems.  Corrected below.

Our goal is to have a fully compliant MPI (except dynamic process management) by Q4 2013 but it may be earlier.   Some individual features may be released early as they are implemented in MPICH2 and verified to work on Cray systems.

Mark Pagel
Cray Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Richard Graham
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 8:48 AM
To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question

As of now I have only received responses on this from Open MPI, MPICH, and SGI.  Do the other implementations want this information included ?  How about Intel, IBM, MVAPICH, NEC, Fujitsu, HP, .... ?

Thanks,
Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Richard Graham
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 9:52 PM
To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question

Feel free to add these to the list of your responses.

Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Pavan Balaji
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 8:25 PM
To: mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question


Below is the list for MPICH --

On 09/03/2012 07:13 PM, Richard Graham wrote:
> - Nonblocking collectives
> - MPI Tool Interface
> - Distributed Graph
> - Noncollective communicator creation

Already supported.

> - RMA enhancements
> - New Fortran bindings
> - Sparse collectives
> - Enhanced Datatype support

November 2012.

What about the remaining features that are voted in?

  - hindexed_block
  - const bindings
  - matched probe
  - intercomm modifications to not conflict with pt2pt tags
  - comm_split_type

For MPICH, these are all already supported.

  -- Pavan

-- 
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum