[Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question

[Richard Graham]

As of now I have only received responses on this from Open MPI, MPICH, and SGI.  Do the other implementations want this information included ?  How about Intel, IBM, MVAPICH, NEC, Fujitsu, HP, .... ?

Thanks,
Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Richard Graham
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 9:52 PM
To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question

Feel free to add these to the list of your responses.

Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Pavan Balaji
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 8:25 PM
To: mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question


Below is the list for MPICH --

On 09/03/2012 07:13 PM, Richard Graham wrote:
> - Nonblocking collectives
> - MPI Tool Interface
> - Distributed Graph
> - Noncollective communicator creation

Already supported.

> - RMA enhancements
> - New Fortran bindings
> - Sparse collectives
> - Enhanced Datatype support

November 2012.

What about the remaining features that are voted in?

  - hindexed_block
  - const bindings
  - matched probe
  - intercomm modifications to not conflict with pt2pt tags
  - comm_split_type

For MPICH, these are all already supported.

  -- Pavan

-- 
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum