[Mpi-forum] Fortran change for discussion

Jeff Squyres jsquyres at cisco.com
Mon Sep 10 10:38:42 CDT 2012

Rich --

Per Jeremiah Willcock's comments, we'd like to add one small clarifying paragraph to the Fortran section.  I think it's totally safe, but it's somehow intangibly above the "chapter author can add it himself" threshold for me.  Specifically: I think the current text is a little weak, but sufficient.  I'm therefore on the fence as to whether the text is *needed* in MPI-3.0 or whether it could be pushed to MPI next.

Can this be added to the agenda during the discussion of user comments for the MPI-3.0 draft 2?

Here's the specific proposal:

> I propose adding the following paragraph after the big paragraph in draft 2 p628:27-44:
> Note that the above definition does not supercede restrictions about
> buffers used with non-blocking operations (e.g., those specified in
> Section~\ref{subsec:pt2pt-commstart}).

Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

More information about the mpi-forum mailing list