[Mpi-forum] Voting results

[Jeff Squyres]

On May 30, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Underwood, Keith D wrote:

> Everyone should note, however, that the answer is irrelevant for interpreting whether those two items passed.  The clarification of "what is required to pass" was done in the minds of everybody voting before the votes were taken.  We can't change the interpretation of a vote after the fact.  The only redress (if people want one) would be to vote again in July... maybe voting rules should get their own half day session :-P


I hear what you're saying, but Mohammad has an excellent point, too.  His ticket would have passed (easily) under the old rules.  They were unable to attend, and were quite surprised when this ticket failed, despite the Forum expressing pretty clear consensus.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/