[Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Passed tickets

[Richard Graham]

It means that I could not tell from a quick look at the ticket which chapters were impacted, and would like the ticket author to send back this information.

Also, w/o a detailed description of what changes need to go into the standard (perhaps via a patch), the changes will not make it into the standard.

Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Bronis R. de Supinski
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 10:30 PM
To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Passed tickets


Rich:

What does it mean when you did not list anything in the chapter column? It looks like 229 touches everything but, as Bill notes with 287, we lack a clean description of what needs to be implemented in each chapter.

I believe 266 only touches the tools/profiling chapter but again nothing is listed. Martin has finally gotten me the updates just today as we had agreed he would some time ago. I do not know when I will be able to review and commit them but probably not this week.

Otherwise, I believe everything that touches the chpaters that I own (ei and prof/tools) has been implemented.

The ticket authors really need to step up on this stuff.

Bronis



On Mon, 28 May 2012, Richard Graham wrote:

> Attached is the list of tickets that have passed all but the final 3.0 chapter vote, and have not yet been incorporated into the approved version – some were taken care of as this list was being created.  I have included the ticket number, ticket owner, and the affected chapter.
>
> Authors: Please send me an update on the affected chapters, AND work with each of the chapter authors to make sure the changes get moved into the approved section.
>
>>>> As we discussed at the current meeting, THE GOAL IS TO GET ALL 
>>>> PASSED CHANGES INTO THE APPROVED REPOSITORY BY JUNE 15. <<
> The goal is to let people start to read over the new version of the standard before the July meeting, so that we can get a draft out for comment 1-2 weeks after the July meeting, and allow for comments before the final vote in Sept.  If you can’t make that date, please let me know ASAP, so we will find someone else who can do the work.
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>