[Mpi-forum] C++ types inaccessible after #281
Jim Dinan
dinan at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Jun 27 10:41:17 CDT 2012
Hi Doug,
Apologies if I'm missing something, but this seems to be the same
situation as the Fortan types, which can be used in the C interface. If
the user can't supply the needed compiler in a particular build, then an
implementation should be free to disable these types.
~Jim.
On 6/26/12 11:41 AM, Douglas Miller wrote:
> I've got to raise a concern here. If we start defining MPI datatypes to
> be C++ types then how will an implementation support that with only a C
> compiler? I thought the point of 281 was to eradicate C++ from the
> standard (and start over later if C++ was to be defined in the standard).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Douglas Miller BlueGene Messaging Development
> IBM Corp., Rochester, MN USA Bldg 030-2 A401
> dougmill at us.ibm.com Douglas Miller/Rochester/IBM
>
> Inactive hide details for Jed Brown ---06/26/2012 11:26:16 AM---Jed
> Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov>Jed Brown ---06/26/2012 11:26:16 AM---Jed
> Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov>
>
> *Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov>*
> Sent by: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org
>
> 06/26/2012 11:14 AM
> Please respond to
> Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>
>
>
> To
>
>
> Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>,
>
>
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
>
> Re: [Mpi-forum] C++ types inaccessible after #281
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Jeff Squyres <_jsquyres at cisco.com_
> <mailto:jsquyres at cisco.com>> wrote:
>
> There are a few C++-specific datatypes for which it would be worth
> introducing new C datatypes (e.g., MPI_CXX_COMPLEX). It's too bad
> that no one realized this until now, because this won't make the
> MPI-3 deadline. But it could be part of MPI-3.1 or errata, or some
> such.
>
>
> Two people in offline discussions have suggested that C bindings to the
> std::complex types (I'm not aware of anything else that #281 will lose)
> might qualify as ticket 0._______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
More information about the mpi-forum
mailing list