On Jul 24, 2012, at 12:30 PM, N.M. Maclaren wrote: > Agreed. 'char (*(*(argv_p[])))' is quite simply perverse and, while > equivalent, will merely confuse people :-) +1 :-) -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres at cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/