[Mpi-forum] Other tickets and Re: Upcoming formal readings

[Josh Hursey]

At the October meeting I believe that I gave the list to Bill Gropp at the
end of the meeting.

-- Josh

On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Schulz, Martin <schulz6 at llnl.gov> wrote:

> Hi Rich, all,
>
> On Jan 6, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Graham, Richard L. wrote:
>
> > Each chapter author should gather all the changes, and schedule a time
> for the vote.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> >
> > Chapter committees are posted on the web - just used that for a review I
> needed.
>
> We did a re-align of the committees during the last meeting in Chicago,
> though, and I don't see this reflected anywhere. Is this still valid and,
> if so, does anyone know where this new information is?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Martin
>
>
> >
> > Rich
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent with Good (www.good.com)
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Schulz, Martin [schulz6 at llnl.gov<mailto:schulz6 at llnl.gov>]
> > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 02:24 AM Eastern Standard Time
> > To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Other tickets and Re: Upcoming formal readings
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As a general question: how are we dealing with ticket 0 changes? If I
> remember right, they need a reading and a full forum vote as well (in the
> same meeting), at least that's how we handled the early ticket zero changes
> for the profiling chapter. Will there be some dedicated time in the March
> meeting for this or should we bring these things up individually with the
> chapter authors and have them organize the readings and votes?
> >
> > As for the chapter authors and committees: are they still the same as on
> the webpage or did we switch to the new assignments we decided on last time
> in Chicago? If so, where is  that information?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Fab Tillier wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Rolf,
> >>
> >> Rolf Rabenseifner wrote on Thu, 5 Jan 2012 at 10:00:52
> >>
> >>> What are we doing with the following tickets that are not fully ready:
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> #125 Use of [] in output arrays ("trivial text changes")
> >>>
> >>> #126 Consistent use of [] for input arrays
> >>
> >> These two are ticket-0 type changes, as they don't change the function
> signatures.  I know Torsten already did some of them for the collective
> chapter.  Not sure why these aren't listed with "trivial text changes"
> below...
> >>
> >> -Fab
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mpi-forum mailing list
> >> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm
> > CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpi-forum mailing list
> > mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm
> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
>


-- 
Joshua Hursey
Postdoctoral Research Associate
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
http://users.nccs.gov/~jjhursey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpi-forum/attachments/20120109/be1f0648/attachment-0001.html>