[Mpi-forum] ICOMM_DUP / agenda

[Jeff Squyres]

Fair enough.  Can we change the agenda to call it an overflow slot?  I say this because I'm guessing we'll get the same question multiple times when people start looking at the agenda in detail.  :-)


On Jan 6, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Graham, Richard L. wrote:

> Not intentional, but decided to leave it there for spill over, as we already have a very full agenda ...
> 
> Rich
> 
> On Jan 6, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Torsten Hoefler wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 05:39:18PM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>> I see that ICOMM_DUP (#168) is on the agenda twice: Tue and Wed afternoons.
>>> 
>>> Is that intentional?
>> Hmm, not from my perspective, I was planning on using the Tue slot only
>> (I didn't realize there was a Wed slot :-). Maybe that could accommodate
>> Adam's Info stuff?
>> 
>> Torsten
>> 
>> -- 
>> bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --------------------- http://www.unixer.de/ -----
>> Torsten Hoefler         | Performance Modeling and Simulation Lead
>> Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois (UIUC)
>> 1205 W Clark Street     | Urbana, IL, 61801
>> NCSA Building           | +01 (217) 244-7736
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/