[Mpi-forum] Confusion about new 1 sided

Rajeev Thakur thakur at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Mar 28 12:19:33 CDT 2011


Cool. Thanks for the careful read. There will likely be several ticket 0 issues (Bronis has many).

Rajeev


On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:

> FWIW, I have found many ticket 0 quality issues and I have a lot of questions, but the biggest mistake I four so far is that the fortran binding for fetch and op on page 21 is very wrong (prob cut n paste error). 
> 
> Sent from my phone. No type good. 
> 
> On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:40 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres at cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> Ok, thanks. 
>> 
>> Sent from my phone. No type good. 
>> 
>> On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:33 AM, "Rajeev Thakur" <thakur at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>> 
>>> Jeff,
>>>     I printed out the old and the new, and as far as I can tell, everything is there, but there are so many changes that things are not exactly in the same spot.
>>> 
>>> Rajeev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mar 28, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Rajeev Thakur wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Text has been moved around in the chapter, so green text may not appear in exactly the same location in 2.2.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 28, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> ...and green text that is not in 2.2. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Did the wrong document get posted?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my phone. No type good. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:07 AM, "Rajeev Thakur" <thakur at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> It should be that green=old text to be deleted, red=new text. What specific case are your referring to?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Rajeev
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm tryin to read the new doc that Bill sent around and it does not seem to be comparable to the 2.2 doc. Ie, the changes anddeletions highlighted in red and green do not appear in the actual 2.2 text. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So what exactly are the red and green in this document?  What is being added anddeleted from the original 2.2 doc?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sent from my phone. No type good. 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> mpi-forum mailing list
>>>>>>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> mpi-forum mailing list
>>>>>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mpi-forum mailing list
>>>>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpi-forum mailing list
>>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum





More information about the mpi-forum mailing list