[Mpi-forum] March meeting

[Fab Tillier]

Graham, Richard L. wrote on Mon, 14 Mar 2011 at 10:28:51

> Nothing wrong - if these don't show up, just ping me, like others do ...

Do the mails we sent over the past month and some not count as proper 'pings'?  If not, what is a proper format for a 'ping'?  I expected that an email titled "next meeting agenda" and "March Meeting agenda" would have met the bar. 

I tried to get these items on the agenda as early as possible, and am a bit taken aback to be told that, at this point, the request is too late and the schedule too tight.

-Fab

> 
> Rich
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jeff Squyres [mailto:jsquyres at cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 01:19 PM
> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] March meeting
> 
> We have been asking for these sessions for 1+ month.  Bill asked for an RMA
> session 2 days and got it.  What are we doing wrong?
> 
> - Fab asked you both in person and via email on Feb 9 (last day of the
> last meeting)
> - Fab sent email to you on Feb 24
> - I sent email to you on March 4
> - Fab sent email to you on March 14 (today)
> 
> All sessions need to be plenary.
> 
> The First Reading of the MPI_Count/collectives stuff will take 2 hours.  Fab
> needs 30 mins to talk about const; I need 30 mins for timers.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 14, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Graham, Richard L. wrote:
> 
>> How much time do you need for each of these ?  I have gone to a mode
>> where I don't add things to the agenda, unless explicitly asked, as we
>> have had problems with session just not taking place, and slots are
>> VERY tight.
>> 
>> Rich
>> 
>> On 3/14/11 10:41 AM, "Fab Tillier" <ftillier at microsoft.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Rich,
>>> 
>>> I don't see on the agenda (maybe it's out of date) a time slot for the
>>> first reading of ticket 265 (MPI_Count) and 269 (W version of
>>> collectives, broken out of 265).  I also don't see a time slot to talk
>>> about 'const', or the MPI Timer requests.  I'd appreciate not having the
>>> lunch slots again if possible.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Fab
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>> [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Graham,
>>> Richard L.
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 11:18 PM
>>> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
>>> Subject: [Mpi-forum] March meeting
>>> 
>>> There are still several slots available for the upcoming meeting in
>>> Chicago.  If you would like to have a slot, please let me know.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Rich
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpi-forum mailing list
>>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpi-forum mailing list
>>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> 
>