[Mpi-forum] Ticket #265: MPI_Count PDF

[Moody, Adam T.]

Hi Jeff,
A few more ticket 0 items for the Count ticket.

I still don't like using "respectively", but I guess it works.  How about something like the following (drop the function names and just talk about the argument), e.g.:

Change:
If the lower bound of the datatype cannot be expressed by the lb argument of
MPI_TYPE_GET_EXTENT or MPI_TYPE_GET_EXTENT_X, then these functions set this
value to MPI_UNDEFINED, respectively.

to:
If the lower bound of the datatype cannot be expressed by the lb argument,
then lb is set to the value to MPI_UNDEFINED.

If you want to go with adding "respectively", then I found a few more places to add it so that we're at least consistent.

p100/11
p100/13
p102/20
p102/23
p106/31

p438/42 seems to be a space missing

-Adam


________________________________________
From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres [jsquyres at cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 1:03 PM
To: MPI Forum list
Subject: [Mpi-forum] Ticket #265: MPI_Count PDF

Has been uploaded to ticket 265:

https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/raw-attachment/ticket/265/ticket-265-with-respectively.pdf

Here's a syntax-hilighted diff of what has changed since the May meeting:

https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/attachment/ticket/265/ticket-265-diff-since-may-2011-meeting.diff

--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/


_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum