[Mpi-forum] Ticket #265: MPI_Count PDF
Moody, Adam T.
moody20 at llnl.gov
Tue Jul 19 16:04:43 CDT 2011
A few more ticket 0 items for the Count ticket.
I still don't like using "respectively", but I guess it works. How about something like the following (drop the function names and just talk about the argument), e.g.:
If the lower bound of the datatype cannot be expressed by the lb argument of
MPI_TYPE_GET_EXTENT or MPI_TYPE_GET_EXTENT_X, then these functions set this
value to MPI_UNDEFINED, respectively.
If the lower bound of the datatype cannot be expressed by the lb argument,
then lb is set to the value to MPI_UNDEFINED.
If you want to go with adding "respectively", then I found a few more places to add it so that we're at least consistent.
p438/42 seems to be a space missing
From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres [jsquyres at cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 1:03 PM
To: MPI Forum list
Subject: [Mpi-forum] Ticket #265: MPI_Count PDF
Has been uploaded to ticket 265:
Here's a syntax-hilighted diff of what has changed since the May meeting:
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
More information about the mpi-forum