[Mpi-forum] First reading: Remove NBC C++ bindings
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
Thu Apr 14 14:40:53 CDT 2011
On Apr 14, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Jeff Hammond wrote:
> Someone (you?) has argued in the past that deprecation doesn't not
> mean they won't be supported, but as is clearly true from the NBC
> ticket, it means that C++ bindings won't exist for features new in
> MPI-3, which makes it impossible for a C++ person to use the MPI API
> coherently.
We're drifting off-topic here.
a) My ticket is only about fixing the Forum's inconsistency with regards to C++ bindings for MPI-3 functions. As I previously mentioned, it's only due to a quirk of timing that NBC passed with C++ bindings.
b) The C++ bindings are already deprecated. If someone wants to un-deprecate them, that's fine. But that's a separate issue. My ticket is solely about resolving the inconstancy in the Forum's current decision about the MPI-3 C++ bindings.
> The state of
> limbo you propose will just make the MPI Forum look stupid: ...
The salient missing point here is that the C++ bindings *are* deprecated. It's a done deal. Over a year ago. I'm not proposing anything new here. Indeed, there are other MPI-3 functions that have been (or are about to be) added that have no corresponding C++ bindings.
NBC is actually inconsistent with these other new MPI-3 functions.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
More information about the mpi-forum
mailing list