[Mpi-comments] Comment on example 6.36 of MPI 4.1 document

[Jim Dinan]

I created an issue for this here:
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/859__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YEKjV6dFM-7tMHYz2YUD9pUx1HbuO-DIa5GBRSupZ6vMEEBfmhS6Yu19c63Zq3lpj3k-0zhgyrsE81eVPJf3DST7IU6l57zU$ 

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 9:57 AM Arham Amouei via mpi-comments <
mpi-comments at lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> This comment is about example 6.36 of MPI 4.1 document (on page 303) which
> concerns the usage of collective operations with overlapping communicators.
> I have already posted my comment as a question on stackoverflow.com, so I
> won't repeat it here. Here is the link to the post:
> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77844104/overlapping-communicators-and-collective-operations-in-mpi__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YEKjV6dFM-7tMHYz2YUD9pUx1HbuO-DIa5GBRSupZ6vMEEBfmhS6Yu19c63Zq3lpj3k-0zhgyrsE81eVPJf3DST7IQbVNXZM$ 
>
> The link to the standard:
> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/mpi-4.1/mpi41-report.pdf__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YEKjV6dFM-7tMHYz2YUD9pUx1HbuO-DIa5GBRSupZ6vMEEBfmhS6Yu19c63Zq3lpj3k-0zhgyrsE81eVPJf3DST7IaIlTGgt$ 
>
> Kind regards,
> Arham
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-comments mailing list
> mpi-comments at lists.mpi-forum.org
> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-comments__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YEKjV6dFM-7tMHYz2YUD9pUx1HbuO-DIa5GBRSupZ6vMEEBfmhS6Yu19c63Zq3lpj3k-0zhgyrsE81eVPJf3DST7IeWUlZMG$ 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpi-comments/attachments/20241117/8d707830/attachment.html>