From james.dinan at gmail.com Sun Nov 17 13:25:58 2024 From: james.dinan at gmail.com (Jim Dinan) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 14:25:58 -0500 Subject: [Mpi-comments] Comment on example 6.36 of MPI 4.1 document In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I created an issue for this here: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/859__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YEKjV6dFM-7tMHYz2YUD9pUx1HbuO-DIa5GBRSupZ6vMEEBfmhS6Yu19c63Zq3lpj3k-0zhgyrsE81eVPJf3DST7IU6l57zU$ On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 9:57?AM Arham Amouei via mpi-comments < mpi-comments at lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote: > Hi > > This comment is about example 6.36 of MPI 4.1 document (on page 303) which > concerns the usage of collective operations with overlapping communicators. > I have already posted my comment as a question on stackoverflow.com, so I > won't repeat it here. Here is the link to the post: > https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77844104/overlapping-communicators-and-collective-operations-in-mpi__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YEKjV6dFM-7tMHYz2YUD9pUx1HbuO-DIa5GBRSupZ6vMEEBfmhS6Yu19c63Zq3lpj3k-0zhgyrsE81eVPJf3DST7IQbVNXZM$ > > The link to the standard: > https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/mpi-4.1/mpi41-report.pdf__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YEKjV6dFM-7tMHYz2YUD9pUx1HbuO-DIa5GBRSupZ6vMEEBfmhS6Yu19c63Zq3lpj3k-0zhgyrsE81eVPJf3DST7IaIlTGgt$ > > Kind regards, > Arham > _______________________________________________ > mpi-comments mailing list > mpi-comments at lists.mpi-forum.org > https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-comments__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YEKjV6dFM-7tMHYz2YUD9pUx1HbuO-DIa5GBRSupZ6vMEEBfmhS6Yu19c63Zq3lpj3k-0zhgyrsE81eVPJf3DST7IeWUlZMG$ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: