[Mpi-comments] One comment on MPI-3.0 Draft 2, August 2012
Jim Dinan
dinan at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Aug 15 10:54:32 CDT 2012
Hi Sebastien,
Something to consider in addition to probe is that fairness semantics
are also relevant to test/wait operations that take arrays of requests.
It may make the most sense to attach a fairness attribute to
communication contexts (communicators and windows) to provide more
flexibility. This could already be done by an MPI implementation
through an info key on a communicator/window, however implementations
need not support all info keys and fairness could be a requirement for
applications that rely on it.
Cheers,
~Jim.
On 8/15/12 10:19 AM, Sébastien Boisvert wrote:
> Maybe there could be something like MPI_Init_fairness which could either
> be MPI_FAIRNESS_NO (the current behavior) or MPI_FAIRNESS_YES (which
> would do round-robin reception).
More information about the mpi-comments
mailing list