[Mpi-22] Ticket #46: Add const Keyword to the C bindings- implementation

[Erez Haba]

Possibly you'll have to cast.
There are few interfaces that take const for send buffer (like sockets).
In other cases you copy the buffer (like with IB) which keeps the const property.

Thanks,
.Erez

-----Original Message-----
From: mpi-22-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi-22-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Underwood, Keith D
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:05 PM
To: MPI 2.2
Subject: Re: [Mpi-22] Ticket #46: Add const Keyword to the C bindings- implementation

It would seem like const would eventually have to be cast away for most lower level interfaces.  Portals, Elan, IB Verbs, and as best I can tell MX don't have const on their send buffers... 

Keith 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: mpi-22-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi-22-bounces_at_lists.mpi-
>forum.org] On Behalf Of Erez Haba
>Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:44 PM
>To: MPI 2.2
>Subject: Re: [Mpi-22] Ticket #46: Add const Keyword to the C bindings-
>implementation
>
>No, it's not being cast away (although it is a quick way for you to
>implement it).
>In MPICH2 implementation it trickles down to the lower functions. There are
>very few places where the const is being cast away because ticket #46 does
>not to break backward compatibility.
>For example, when the user function is called (const was not added to the
>MPI_User_function) the implementation must cast away const from the send
>buffer before calling the user function.
>
>Thanks,
>.Erez
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: mpi-22-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi-22-bounces_at_lists.mpi-
>forum.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres
>Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:34 AM
>To: MPI 2.2
>Subject: Re: [Mpi-22] Ticket #46: Add const Keyword to the C bindings-
>implementation
>
>More importantly, how is const handled?  Is it just cast away inside
>the MPI library?
>
>
>On Mar 12, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Underwood, Keith D wrote:
>
>> Since the main purpose of an implementation for something like
>> adding const is to see how invasive the change is, would it be
>> possible to get a diff against the trees that these were created from?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Keith
>>
>> From: mpi-22-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi-22-
>bounces_at_[hidden]
>> ] On Behalf Of Erez Haba
>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:24 PM
>> To: MPI 2.2
>> Subject: [Mpi-22] Ticket #46: Add const Keyword to the C bindings -
>> implementation
>>
>>
>> Implementation for ticket #46 is now available from ANL (thanks Pavan)
>>
>>
>> tarballs
>>
>http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/mpich2/downloads/tarballs/nightly/
>const
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>> .Erez
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-22 mailing list
>> mpi-22_at_[hidden]
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-22
>
>
>--
>Jeff Squyres
>Cisco Systems
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpi-22 mailing list
>mpi-22_at_[hidden]
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-22
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpi-22 mailing list
>mpi-22_at_[hidden]
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-22

_______________________________________________
mpi-22 mailing list
mpi-22_at_[hidden]
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-22