[Mpi-22] 2.2 at April meeting?

[Jeff Squyres]

Bill --

Do we plan to have any time allocated in the April meeting to MPI 2.2,  
or are we still in a holding pattern waiting for 2.1?

If we do discuss 2.2 in April, I'd like a few minutes to discuss the  
whole "const" issues surrounding the C++ bindings.  A few people asked  
me last meeting to rehash the issues, etc.

In short: my position is that *all* predefined handles in the C++  
bindings should be "const" (reversing some of the [incorrect, I  
believe] errata) and fixing a few C++ API bindings to compensate.   
MPI::BOTTOM is the only exception, but we have discussed that one to  
death already.

If we push all the 2.2 discussions out to the June meeting, no problem  
-- I just wanted to queue up the "const" discussion for whenever the  
2.2 discussions occur.


-- 
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems